Mariner's Compass – Sunderland
The Newbottle attribution for this transfer is convoluted, and relates to pottery items donated by descendants of the owners to the Victoria and Albert Museum. Read more here.
Distinguishing characteristics are: the male figure has three rows of buttons on his waistcoat (compare with the Seaham transfer which has two rows; the fur on the lion's cheek is shaded diagonally. There's also a horizontal scratch on the copper plate running over SW by S. See details below from plaque (left) and first jug below (right).
The brightly enamelled plaques below are attributed to Newbottle. Compare the lime green and red decoration of the left plaque with the wash ewer above.
Moore's Wear Pottery appears to have acquired the Newbottle-attributed transfer plate in the mid 1850s, when the Brodrick and Beckwith partnership dissolved. The Moore plaques are larger, have dark brown (rather than copper lustre) borders, and tend to be more crudely decorated. They were likely made right up until c1870.
Below, a small jug with similar enamel decoration to the first plaque above, and beneath it a frog mug. Both have zig-zag lustre decoration associated with Moore's, c1860.
Distinguishing characteristics are: the fur on the lion's cheek is shaded horizontally; the male figure has only two rows of buttons on his waistcoat (compare with the Newbottle transfer which has three rows); and there's a small nick I the copper plate to the left of SSW, likely made at the time of engraving.
The details above come from the first jug below, which is decorated with coloured enamels. We know that the jugs and mug below predate the 1847 jug above, because the transfer doesn't have some of the imperfections/scratches that appear on later imprints from the copper plate (see two details below).
The later imprints from the copper plate have a scratch over the lower right quadrant of the shield (indicated left below), and a scratch to the right of SSW (indicated right below). These details are from the 1847 jug.
The bowl below has both of those imperfections, and is contemporary with the Walker & Co, 1847 jug.
Mariner's Compass – Tyneside
Redhead, Wilson & Co, Forth Banks, Newcastle Pottery – 1833–1838
This version of the transfer on a small jug with very distinctive decoration that is firmly attributable to the Newcastle Pottery.
The same transfer below on a heavily lustred Newcastle Pottery jug from the 1830s or 40s.
The short spout and deep purple splash lustre are typical of the Newcastle Pottery. This distinctive transfer of The Foresters Arms appears on Newcastle jugs with a yellow stripe.
Attributed to Thomas Fell, St Peters Pottery – 1
This pearlware jug from the 1830s is attributed to Fell on the basis that the transfer appears on the jug below it with a transfer of Newcastle High Level Bridge attributed to Thomas Fell.
The engraver slipped on the second 'N' in 'NwbyN' on the compass (left details above). He also slipped on the 'N' of 'EbyN' (see right details). More work is needed to firm up this attribution to Thomas Fell.
The transfer is similar to the Seaham version. The man's waistcoat has only two rows of buttons. However, the row to the left is larger than on the Seaham transfer. The lion's face is horizontally shaded. But the arrangement of the tufts of grass in the foreground is different.
The jug below (photo Mendip Auction Rooms) unites two Fell groups. It combines the decorative lustre flourishes, typical of Fell items from the 1840s, with the Mariner's Compass transfer on the jug above.
Attributed to Thomas Fell, St Peters Pottery – 2
This version of the Mariner's Compass is a very fine and distinctive transfer. It is less cartoon-like than the variations above.
The jug, c1840, is attributed to Fell on the basis of the distinctive lustre decoration, elements of which are found on plaques with the Fell impress. Note the painted lustre sun on the first image of the jug. The over-glaze transfers of Fell items from this period have a sooty quality.
Unidentified Tyneside pottery
Unfortunately, this bowl is damaged, and a restorer has painted-in sections of the transfer making comparison difficult. A number of Tyneside potteries are known to have used the London impress.
Although Maling isn't currently on the list of potteries that used the London mark, the bowl above has similar decoration to the bowl below, firmly attributed to C T Maling.